/Decision Backtest

Decision-Based Backtesting

Evaluate historical alpha generated by each ISC allocation decision

Total Alpha (ISC Decisions)

+3.77%

6 decisions evaluated

Decision Win Rate

+83.33%

5 of 6 decisions positive

Best Decision

+1.28%

Mid-Year Review — Private Equity

Avg Signal Score

66.7

At time of decision

Cumulative Alpha from ISC Decisions

Running total alpha generated since tracking began

Alpha by Decision

Individual decision alpha contribution (sorted by impact)

Decision Alpha Detail

All evaluated ISC decisions with alpha estimates

DateDecisionAsset ClassTypeConvictionSignalAlpha Est.RegimeOutcome
2024-01-15Q1 2024 Tactical Shift — EM OverweightEmerging MarketsTacticalHigh78+0.820%Bull Marketpositive
2024-03-22Q1 Rebalance — Fixed Income Duration ReductionTaxable Fixed IncomeRebalanceModerate62+0.410%Bull Marketpositive
2024-06-10Mid-Year Review — Private Equity IncreasePrivate EquityStrategicHigh71+1.280%Neutralpositive
2024-09-05Q3 Adjustment — Commodities UnderweightCommoditiesTacticalLow38-0.350%Neutralnegative
2024-12-12Year-End Review — U.S. Large Cap OverweightU.S. Large CapTacticalHigh85+0.940%Bull Marketpositive
2024-04-28Q2 High Yield — Credit Spread OpportunityHigh YieldOpportunisticModerate66+0.670%Bull Marketpositive

Alpha estimate = forward excess return over neutral weight for the decision's time horizon. Win = alpha > 0.

Win Rate by Asset Class

% of decisions that generated positive alpha

Signal Score vs Alpha

Higher signals should generate more alpha

Alpha by Market Regime

Average decision alpha by regime at time of decision

Conviction vs Alpha Outcome

Do high-conviction calls generate more alpha?

Counterfactual Analysis

What if we had stayed at neutral weight for an asset class?

DecisionDateAlpha (Actual)Counterfactual (Neutral)Delta
Q1 2024 Tactical Shift — EM Overweight2024-01-15+0.820%+0.000%+0.820%
Total (Emerging Markets)+0.820%+0.000%+0.820%

Counterfactual assumes zero active tilt — staying at neutral benchmark weight throughout the period.